California Attorneys Defending California Larceny, California Embezzlement, California Shoplifting Law Statutes
California Attorneys Defending
California Larceny, California Embezzlement, California Shoplifting
California Larceny Crimes Defense
Larceny/Shoplifting
California Penal § 484. What constitutes theft; Determination of value of property; Presumptions
(a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or drive away the personal property of another, or who shall fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted to him or her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property, or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft. In determining the value of the property obtained, for the purposes of this section, the reasonable and fair market value shall be the test, and in determining the value of services received the contract price shall be the test. If there be no contract price, the reasonable and going wage for the service rendered shall govern. For the purposes of this section, any false or fraudulent representation or pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any money, property or service received as a result thereof, and the complaint, information or indictment may charge that the crime was committed on any date during the particular period in question. The hiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each of them of every labor claim due and unpaid and every judgment that the employer has been unable to meet shall be prima facie evidence of intent to defraud.
(b)
(1) Except as provided in Section 10855 of the Vehicle Code, where a person has leased or rented the personal property of another person pursuant to a written contract, and that property has a value greater than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and is not a commonly used household item, intent to commit theft by fraud shall be rebuttably presumed if the person fails to return the personal property to its owner within 10 days after the owner has made written demand by certified or registered mail following the expiration of the lease or rental agreement for return of the property so leased or rented.
(2) Except as provided in Section 10855 of the Vehicle Code, where a person has leased or rented the personal property of another person pursuant to a written contract, and where the property has a value no greater than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or where the property is a commonly used household item, intent to commit theft by fraud shall be rebuttably presumed if the person fails to return the personal property to its owner within 20 days after the owner has made written demand by certified or registered mail following the expiration of the lease or rental agreement for return of the property so leased or rented.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (b), if one presents with criminal intent identification which bears a false or fictitious name or address for the purpose of obtaining the lease or rental of the personal property of another, the presumption created herein shall apply upon the failure of the lessee to return the rental property at the expiration of the lease or rental agreement, and no written demand for the return of the leased or rented property shall be required.
(d) The presumptions created by subdivisions (b) and (c) are presumptions affecting the burden of producing evidence.
(e) Within 30 days after the lease or rental agreement has expired, the owner shall make written demand for return of the property so leased or rented. Notice addressed and mailed to the lessee or renter at the address given at the time of the making of the lease or rental agreement and to any other known address shall constitute proper demand. Where the owner fails to make such written demand the presumption created by subdivision (b) shall not apply.
California Penal § 492. Larceny of written instrument
If the thing stolen consists of any evidence of debt, or other written instrument, the amount of money due thereupon, or secured to be paid thereby, and remaining unsatisfied, or which in any contingency might be collected thereon, or the value of the property the title to which is shown thereby, or the sum which might be recovered in the absence thereof, is the value of the thing stolen.
California Penal § 487. Grand theft
Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases:
(a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950), except as provided in subdivision (b).
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), grand theft is committed in any of the following cases:
(1)
(A) When domestic fowls, avocados, olives, citrus or deciduous fruits, other fruits, vegetables, nuts, artichokes, or other farm crops are taken of a value exceeding two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
(B) For the purposes of establishing that the value of domestic fowls, avocados, olives, citrus or deciduous fruits, other fruits, vegetables, nuts, artichokes, or other farm crops under this paragraph exceeds two hundred fifty dollars ($250), that value may be shown by the presentation of credible evidence which establishes that on the day of the theft domestic fowls, avocados, olives, citrus or deciduous fruits, other fruits, vegetables, nuts, artichokes, or other farm crops of the same variety and weight exceeded two hundred fifty dollars ($250) in wholesale value.
(2) When fish, shellfish, mollusks, crustaceans, kelp, algae, or other aquacultural products are taken from a commercial or research operation which is producing that product, of a value exceeding two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
(3) Where the money, labor, or real or personal property is taken by a servant, agent, or employee from his or her principal or employer and aggregates nine hundred fifty dollars ($950) or more in any 12 consecutive month period.
(c) When the property is taken from the person of another.
(d) When the property taken is any of the following:
(1) An automobile, horse, mare, gelding, any bovine animal, any caprine animal, mule, jack, jenny, sheep, lamb, hog, sow, boar, gilt, barrow, or pig.
(2) A firearm.
California Penal § 490a. Substitution of “theft” for other terms
Wherever any law or statute of this state refers to or mentions larceny, embezzlement, or stealing, said law or statute shall hereafter be read and interpreted as if the word “theft” were substituted therefor.
California Penal § 503. “Embezzlement” defined
Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been intrusted.
California Indecent Exposure Defense Lawyer Law statutes
California Indecent Exposure Defense Lawyer
Indecent Exposure
Indecent Exposure in California
California Penal § 314. Indecent exposure
Every person who willfully and lewdly, either:
1. Exposes his person, or the private parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed thereby; or,
2. Procures, counsels, or assists any person so to expose himself or take part in any model artist exhibition, or to make any other exhibition of himself to public view, or the view of any number of persons, such as is offensive to decency, or is adapted to excite to vicious or lewd thoughts or acts, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Every person who violates subdivision 1 of this section after having entered, without consent, an inhabited dwelling house, or trailer coach as defined in Section 635 of the Vehicle Code, or the inhabited portion of any other building, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, or in the county jail not exceeding one year.
Upon the second and each subsequent conviction under subdivision 1 of this section, or upon a first conviction under subdivision 1 of this section after a previous conviction under Section 288, every person so convicted is guilty of a felony, and is punishable by imprisonment in state prison.
California San Diego County Reckless Driving Lawyers Attorneys
Five persons were injured in an accident in San Diego County including a 9-year-old boy. The driver responsible to the accident was arrested for reckless driving.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Reckless Driving Crash Arrested Lawyers Attorneys
A Stockton area man who tried to elude California Highway Patrol officers early this morning reportedly crashed his 2011 Hyundai Sonata east of Willows at 130 mph, but was unharmed.
He was arrested for the charge of reckless driving by the California Highway Patrol Officers.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Reckless Driving Influence Lawyers Attorneys
A driver was arrested on suspicion of reckless driving and driving under the influence of marijuana after his pickup skidded into another pickup that had overturned on Highway 299 west of Highway 89.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Reckless Driving Breath Test Refusing Lawyers Attorneys
Jenelo S. Stevens, 58, was also charged with refusing to submit to a breath test and reckless driving after a wreck Sunday in the northern part of the Marin County.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Kern County Reckless Driving Fleeing Lawyers Attorneys
When Kern County Police reportedly attempted to pull over a maroon F-250 reported to be stolen the driver, Brenham aged 42 accelerated and fled. He was later caught and arrested for reckless driving and fleeing with a stolen vehicle.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Reckless Driving Criminal Prosecution Lawyers Attorneys
In a criminal prosecution for vehicular murder, the People were permitted to show defendant’s implied malice by his conduct on the day of the fatal collision and past incidents of speeding and reckless driving.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Reckless Driving Intent Commit Battery Deadly Weapon Lawyers Attorneys
It was error to hold that defendant’s reckless driving, which resulted when he fled from police, generated transferable intent to commit battery via automobile where he did not deliberately use vehicle as deadly weapon with intent to injure officer.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
California Exceeding Speed Reckless Driving Misdemeanor Lawyers Attorneys
Exceeding 100 miles per hour was not a lesser and necessarily included offense of reckless driving, as one could drive recklessly at speeds below 100 miles per hour. Reckless driving was not reducible from a misdemeanor to an infraction.
Reckless driving is a very serious crime in California.
The SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving attorneys can defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Our California Reckless driving lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of Reckless driving charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group California Reckless driving lawyer in California.
